VISA Small Mindedness

  • Visa "small" business ad
    Message integration is a main driver for successful advertising. VISA's new small business campaign is taking a different route...

Irony Defined

  • Phone3
    As advertisers face an increasingly congested public space, battling for eyeballs and mindshare, it is ironic that new cell phones cannot be used to dial 1.888.SPELLED OUT NAMES instead of numbers.

Starbucks' Asinine Advertising

  • IMG_0003
    Look at these examples of Starbucks' advertising which all have been in the marketplace in the past month. Given the three different logos and the unclear location of their "beans for home use" ads, me thinks that Starbucks needs to stick with decaf and rethink its strategy.

Amazon.com Broken Promises

  • ScreenHunter_04 May. 23 18.18
    Even a King of Web like Amazon.com has yet to learn (and embrace) that everything online is a promise that needs to be met.

Netflix: Poor Communication

  • Todd's blog post
    The sum total of communications from Netflix about its decision to eliminate its Profiles feature.

Look Before Launch

  • SuperCuts2
    I had back-to-back poor web experiences this past weekend... reminds me of 10 years ago. It is 2008, isn't it?

MyYahoo! Weather

  • Yahoo Weather 5
    The baffling example of Yahoo!'s inability to use Chicago, IL as an input for weather yet Chicago is perfectly fine.

« Promises, promises... why are they ignored by their makers? | Main | Intel- How To Waste Advertising Dollars »

May 30, 2008

A Tale of Two Neighbors

Regardless of state, county, and soon-to-be even city, we all have two neighbors in common: the current omnipresent Starbucks and the former but "still there" omnipresent McDonald's. As neighbors, we have all visited both to some extent over the past months and years, some of us more than others. 

The question I want to pose is "what is the role of a neighbor"? Do they have any obligations to us? To our community?  And if I change the question to "what is their role to us as customers?" do you come up with a different answer?

Both firms have several things in common.  Both have either company owned or franchise outlets in our neighborhoods.  Both hire from our neighborhoods.  Both have three- to five-mile trade areas so their revenue comes from our neighborhoods.  Both have us as their customers. But this is where the differences end...

As neighbors, we develop feelings for these local retail establishments.  Some bad, most good (I hope).  And as such we want to see them do well, to succeed.  We may even have an idea for them that we want to share, hoping that they find it valuable. Let's look at how our two neighbors would react to accepting our ideas. First Starbucks.

At many Starbucks counters across the nation you will find a small tear pad.  On one side of the tear pad is the  statement "Have an idea for us?".  Flip it over and you will see "Go to 'mystarbucksidea.com'".  So not ScreenHunter_03 May. 25 14.56only do they accept one's idea but the promote it. When one arrives at the site, this is what is seen:

Very inviting, very warm, very encouraging... this make me feel valued and as if Starbucks cares about me as a... well, as a neighbor.  This is what I would want from a neighbor. I can contribute, I can comment, I can vote, and I can connect with others if I care to. Let's compare that with our other neighbor, McDonald's.

Unlike Starbucks, McDonald's does not solicit ideas from its retail outlets.  No tear pads, no signage, no ScreenHunter_01 May. 25 14.54indication (outside of the standard "if you have comments..."). So what is a caring neighbor to do if he or she has an idea? Let's start by going to the McDonald's web site.

On the bottom left of this USA contact page there is a link that, I think, will serve our purpose.  It is the one labeled "Unsolicited Ideas".  Kinda give you a warm and fuzzy feeling for lending a helping hand, doesn't it?  Not "Share Your Ideas!", not "What's On Your Mind?", nothing that inviting or friendly.  There should be icicles hanging off that link

But we click anyway hoping to find a warmer embrace upon the next page. ScreenHunter_02 May. 25 14.54Ah, to no avail.  Upon reading this page one gets the notion that McDonald's (1) gets a lot of ideas, (2) because they get a lot of ideas they do not know how to allocate ownership and thus (3) put up the cold shoulder to avoid the whole damn thing.  Notice the language at the end "greatly appreciate your interest in McDonald's".  If that was truly the case why is it the last thing on the page? Why is the link labeled "Unsolicited Ideas"?  Neither show great appreciation at all.

Let me again point out a key comparison between these two neighbors.  Both have corporate and franchise outlets.  And as such both face the same issues about customers, ideas, and intellectual property rights.  But in one case, Starbucks, it is a warm and inviting approach to these issues.  Their message to me, their neighbor, is "come on in and let me know what's on your mind".  They have, in essence, figured it out.  McDonald's, on the other hand, facing the same issues as their neighbor, Starbucks, has taken the Ostrich approach of burying its head in the sand and shutting down.

Are Starbucks' lawyers smarter than McDonald's? Do they know more about franchising, IP, or innovation?  I think not.  The answer lies, in my opinion, in the core of their values: Starbucks values its customers for all they can contribute, McDonald's only for their current visit...

And would you like me to SuperSize that for you today?

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e551caa416883300e552a382b78834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Tale of Two Neighbors:

Comments

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Worth Your Time